2019:2019-02:2019-02-17
Jump to a different year? Take your pick! ☸ 2000 ☸ 2001 ☸ 2002 ☸ 2003 ☸ 2004 ☸ 2005 ☸ 2006 ☸ 2007 ☸ 2008 ☸ 2009 ☸ 2010 ☸ 2011 ☸ 2012 ☸ 2013 ☸ 2014 ☸ 2015 ☸ 2016 ☸ 2017 ☸ 2018 ☸ 2019 ☸ 2020 ☸ 2021 ☸ 2022 ☸ 2023 ☸ 2024 ☸
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2019:2019-02:2019-02-17 [2019/02/18 00:27] – created randolo | 2019:2019-02:2019-02-17 [2020/06/14 23:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| I suppose I should add that by comparison, their treatment of Bach seemed a trifle light weight... perhaps a bit Haydn-like? I suppose it's a choice of taste. While other groups like to put a lot of sturm und drang into their performances of old Ludwig van B, it seemed to me that the Danes treated the 16th as simply another piece of drawing room music. Which isn't to ding them or their interpretation, | I suppose I should add that by comparison, their treatment of Bach seemed a trifle light weight... perhaps a bit Haydn-like? I suppose it's a choice of taste. While other groups like to put a lot of sturm und drang into their performances of old Ludwig van B, it seemed to me that the Danes treated the 16th as simply another piece of drawing room music. Which isn't to ding them or their interpretation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sometimes it's interesting to look back, and I was surprised to note that when I saw them about [five years ago](http:// | ||
| [Program Notes](https:// | [Program Notes](https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rebecca Wishnia posted a laudatory [review](https:// | ||
| {{tag> | {{tag> | ||
2019/2019-02/2019-02-17.1550474859.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/02/18 00:27 by randolo
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
